Friday, October 26, 2007

False Advertising, Take 2, courtesy the Washington Post

CMR wrote the following Letter to the Editor of the Washington Post, to respond to a Post editorial on military recruitment ads appearing on a gay website. The letter was considered for publication, but ultimtately went unpublished. As we noted in an earlier post, the story was originally reported by USA Today.

The October 26 editorial titled "Don't Ask," which trumpeted the disingenuous PR campaign for gays in the military, missed the point. Defense Department advertising should be directed toward potential recruits who are eligible to serve in the military. Under the law passed by Congress in 1993, which is almost always mislabeled "Don't Ask, Don't Tell," persons who engage in homosexual conduct are ineligible.

Agencies that misspent defense dollars by placing ads on gay professional networking websites should be required to reimburse the military. According to the USA Today report that the editorial cited, the Army National Guard alone will invest $6.5 million in internet recruiting this year. Comparable expenditures are probably true of the other services. The armed forces are due a refund.

"Don't Ask, Don't Tell" (DADT) is constantly confused with the law that Congress actually passed, technically known as "Section 654, Title 10." DADT describes a set of inconsistent enforcement regulations imposed by Bill Clinton as a "transitional policy" toward open homosexuality in the military. To reduce confusion, and the number of homosexual discharges to near zero, the administration should drop Bill Clinton's "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy, and fully enforce the law.

Tommy Sears
Executive Director, CMR

Thursday, October 18, 2007

"Patsy Plaque"--W. Times

See page 2 of the October 18 Washington Times regular "Inside the Beltway" feature (excerpted below):

The Center for Military Readiness (CMR) says the purpose of its annual "Patsy Award"---by dictionary definition, a patsy is "one who is easily taken advantage of"---is to draw attention to problems in the U.S. military ignored by the White House and Congress. "When officials fail to use their power to do the right thing, others use their power to do the wrong thing," CMR President Elaine Donnelly explains. This year, the surprisingly handsome Patsy plaque goes to Gene Gritton of the Rand Corporation "for approving the disingenuous 'Rubber Stamp Rand Report' on women in combat." "As I wrote in a letter to Mr. Gritton, whether intended or not, the report gives a considerable boost to the agenda of feminists who do not understand military realities," Mrs. Donnelly says. Link

False Advertising for Gays in the Military

USA Today has reported that an advertising error, since corrected, has caused embarrassment to military recruiting commands, and produced an undeserved one-day public relations media hit for advocates of gays in the military. More...

Tuesday, October 16, 2007

CMR Presents "Patsy Award" for RAND Report

It is always nice to recognize and praise officials and policy-makers who support high standards and sound priorities for the military. Sometimes it is necessary, however, to draw attention to individuals who do not live up to their responsibilities. More...

Tuesday, October 9, 2007

Kennedy Smears Military in "Hate Crimes" Bill

We have heard a lot about Rush Limbaugh's alleged insult about "phony soldiers," but almost nothing about a genuine attack against our soldiers that was launched on the floor of the U.S. Senate. More...